PDF Ebook A Manual for Creating Atheists

Loving this publication means loving your hobby. Reading this publication will certainly imply top life high quality to be much better. Much better in al thing might not be attained simply put time. But, this publication will certainly help you to always enhance the kindness as well as spirit of much better life. When finding the A Manual For Creating Atheists to download, you may not overlook this. You have to get it now and review it quicker. Sooner you read this book, quicker you will certainly be extra success from previous! This is your option and we constantly consider it!

A Manual for Creating Atheists

PDF Ebook A Manual for Creating Atheists

Earn now the book entitled A Manual For Creating Atheists to be your resources when going to review. It can be your brand-new collection to not just display in your shelfs however likewise be the one that can aid you fining the very best resources. As alike, publication is the home window to obtain on the planet and you can open the world quickly. These smart words are actually familiar with you, right?

Also the rate of a book A Manual For Creating Atheists is so budget-friendly; many individuals are really thrifty to reserve their money to buy the publications. The various other factors are that they feel bad and have no time to go to guide shop to search guide A Manual For Creating Atheists to check out. Well, this is contemporary age; numerous books can be got conveniently. As this A Manual For Creating Atheists and also more publications, they could be entered quite quick ways. You will not have to go outdoors to obtain this book A Manual For Creating Atheists

Compared with other individuals, when someone constantly attempts to reserve the time for reading, it will give finest. The result of you review A Manual For Creating Atheists today will certainly influence the day assumed as well as future thoughts. It implies that whatever acquired from checking out publication will certainly be long last time financial investment. You may not need to obtain experience in actual problem that will certainly invest more cash, but you could take the method of analysis. You could likewise discover the real thing by reading book.

To earn you feel pleased for regarding this publication, you can see and ask for others regarding this book. The warranty is that you could get the book conveniently and also get this fantastic publication for your life. Reviewing publication is really should do. When you believe it will not serve in the meantime, it will certainly provide much more precious things, also in some cases. By reading this publication, you can feel that it's extremely necessary to acquire guide in this site as a result of the simple means provided.

Product details

#detail-bullets .content {

margin: 0.5em 0px 0em 25px !important;

}

Audible Audiobook

Listening Length: 8 hours and 30 minutes

Program Type: Audiobook

Version: Unabridged

Publisher: Pitchstone Publishing

Audible.com Release Date: December 26, 2013

Language: English, English

ASIN: B00HJ9FVC2

Amazon Best Sellers Rank:

I enjoyed this book because it finally shifted the focus away from religion to the efficacy of faith as a route to knowledge. Many books have focused on debunking the arguments for God, or against religion's historical record. This is not one of those books. Moving the focus to faith as a basis for knowledge is much more effective, because that question underlies not just religion per se, but also belief in the paranormal, new age, and similar issues.I subtracted a star because I felt the title was needlessly inflammatory. The book is about epistemology, and belief is God is a tangential issue. Yes, belief in God is much less tenable if you take away faith, but to me the critical issue is faith. The author could have almost taken God out of the picture altogether and just addressed the viability of faith as a route to knowledge. If you knock that down, then faith in God will be weakened without you needing to address it explicitly. Putting "atheism" right in the title makes prospective readers think you're attacking their religion, something the author warns against explicitly. I don't know if the title was from the author or from the publisher, but I feel it detracts from the focus of the book.However, I think the author makes and sustains a great point throughout the book, that our focus should be on the inadequacy of faith as an epistemology. It's a given that some will say "you're attacking God!" but it's faith as a route to knowledge, not the existence or intervention of God, that he is writing about. If faith is a good route to knowledge, then it would be so even in areas not touching on God or religion. If faith isn't a good source of knowledge in other areas, why pretend that it suddenly becomes competent just because we're talking about religion?

This is a very good book that explains how to use the Socratic Method to expose flaws in a person's method of reasoning (called "epistemology"). Debating the faithful always fails, because debate reinforces their addiction to believing in magic, mysticism, relics, rituals, and making reality claims that violate the laws of physics without providing reproducible independently verifiable evidence.For example, some of the faithful claim that the universe is only 6,000 years old, because the Bible says so. When confronted with reproducible independently verifiable evidence (using scientific measurements of very distant stars) that the universe is actually about 13.8 billion years old, the faithful simply resort to their "trump card" that God used His divine magical powers to teleport instantly that distant starlight to the Earth, thus violating the universal constant of the speed of light. That is a claim about reality that has no reproducible independently verifiable evidence. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.Example, if Noah saved all of the animals from extinction in a Great Flood that covered the entire Earth, then how did he save the Koala Bears that are indigenous to Australia? In reality, the story of Noah is copied from a fable that originated about 1,000 years earlier from the Epic of Gilgamesh in Mesopotamia.Boghossian points out that such examples when posed as debating points cause adverse emotional reactions that impel the afflicted faithful into further self-delusion. This is the "faith virus" trying to protect itself from eradication. Critical Thinking can cure the "faith virus" through the Socratic Method of analyzing how a person is reasoning. It is not about the reasons, but about the *method* of reasoning, the "epistemology", that a person uses to "know" reality.Using the Socratic Method avoids debate by asking simple questions about the faith-based claims to help the afflicted faithful to see how they are reasoning about the real world. By clearing the fog of flawed epistemology, the afflicted are better able to see the real world. The afflicted are then free to use Critical Thinking to arrive at their own reasoned conclusions about the difference between faith and reality.Boghossian goes on to describe how faith and organized religion have infected society through governmental institutions, tax exemptions, preferential laws and regulations, thus causing more real suffering to the general population. The "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders" (DSM) specifically excludes religious faith as a mental disorder, even though religious faith satisfies the definition of mental delusion: "A false belief based on incorrect inference about external reality that is firmly sustained despite what almost everyone else believes and despite what constitutes incontrovertible and obvious proof or evidence to the contrary.""A Manual for Creating Atheists" is a very good step in the right direction for training "Street Epistemologists". In my humble opinion, more formalized training is needed, starting with peaceful parenting (not spanking or threatening children with eternal torment for not believing in God), Critical Thinking in all school grades and colleges, and especially in removing preferences for religious faith from secular government ("Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof").I highly recommend this book.

I just finished a close reading of A Manual for Creating Atheists. I thought it was one of the best anti-theist books I have ever read.(I'm 73 and have seven shelves of books on religion.) The author, a university philosophy professor suggests focusing not on the existence of God, or on the truth of a religion, but on faith which is defined--when used in a religious context--as as "belief on insufficient evidence" or as "pretending to know things you don't know." Otherwise, it wouldn't be faith. He suggests not moving on to another faith-based claim until your theist admits that a particular claim is not justified by faith alone. He suggests asking questions of a theist is most effective. First question might be “What would convince you that your belief in God is mistaken?” If the answer is “nothing,” then “How is your belief different from a delusion?” If you plan to argue religion one-on-one, then this book will tell you how to be more effective. Highly recommended.

This book really changed the way I think about having discussions with people about religion---or anything. Personally, I find it very hard not to jump to facts, get frustrated with people for their ridiculous logical fallacies, and tend to treat non-academic discussions too much like academic discussions (which isn't effective because people are usually NOT logical, not even academics, in their personal life) and so forth.In teaching you how to more effectively nudge religious people to see the validity of a rational/secular approach, the book also teaches you how to genuinely be a better listener and I might even say a better person, in a sense. So please don't think of it as "How to evilly manipulate people." (And if you're a religious person thinking that, I hope you feel the same way about evangelizing, though you probably don't!) It could just as well be titled "How to have more productive discussions with people about your differences" Or "How to make people think more." I think about the advice in this book all the time, and I'd say that about 80% of the instances in which I think about it and try to apply it are not about religion, and sometimes not even about a disagreement.

A Manual for Creating Atheists PDF
A Manual for Creating Atheists EPub
A Manual for Creating Atheists Doc
A Manual for Creating Atheists iBooks
A Manual for Creating Atheists rtf
A Manual for Creating Atheists Mobipocket
A Manual for Creating Atheists Kindle

A Manual for Creating Atheists PDF

A Manual for Creating Atheists PDF

A Manual for Creating Atheists PDF

A Manual for Creating Atheists PDF